EU, BRITISH AND AMERICAN SEALING POLICY IS HYPOCRITICAL AND ANTI-DEMOCRATIC

By Jim Winter, is an ex CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) journalist, ACTRA (Association of Canadian Television and Radio Artists) award winning documentary writer and founding president of the Canadian sealers association.

INUIT EXEMPTION MEANINGLESS ACCORDING TO MANY INUIT ORGANISATIONS
The European Union recently announced that products made from seals hunted by INUIT people can continue to be sold in the EU despite the 2009 ban that prevents sale of other seal products derived from seals killed by non Inuit Canadians. Since the implementation of the ban income from sealing in the INUIT community of Canada has plummeted to a fraction of what it was prior to the ban. It is impossible to imagine a sealing policy that would be more hypocritical and anti-democratic. Animal rights groups constantly make pious, politically correct statements that they are not against Inuit sealing. For decades, Inuit organisations – including the Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC) which represents Northern Aboriginal communities around the world – have rejected this “exemption” as being economically meaningless, based in a colonialist and paternalistic mentality, and little short of racism.

CANADIAN SEALING IS SUSTAINABLE AND GREEN
Canadian sealing is a sustainable use of a natural resource carried out by licensed, well-trained sealers under the rules and regulations of the government of Canada, which have been developed based upon both population science and humane killing techniques, and apply to all Canadians. The population of the Harp seals we hunt is about 7 1/2 million animals more than tripling the population of the herd in a little over 4 decades. None of the seal species we hunt have ever been on any reputable list of either endangered or threatened species. As well, the other seal species hunted in Canada fall into the category of “All known stocks … increasing in number”. The Canadian quota of Harp seals, as established by the scientists, is 400,000 animals but being conscientious conservationists we only take what the market will bear, what we can use, and that varies from year to year and has rarely been over 100,000 in the last decade or so.

MARKETS EXIST BUT ARE DENIED BY “OWNED” POLITICIANS”
Despite the comments of the animal rights groups, the world-wide markets for seal products (food, Omega-3 fatty acids, oil, fur, leather) continue to exist. They exist but are inaccessible because the decades-old animal rights corporations’ propaganda campaigns have co-opted (bought?) politicians in the EU, the USA, Britain and other countries have enacted a “ban”. The “ban” denies their citizens their democratic right to choose to buy seal products: or not. The right of choice should be the individual citizens right. But that right has been stolen by politicians reacting to the propaganda of multi million dollar lobbying corporations with war chests approaching a couple of hundred million dollars. When propaganda wins democracy loses.

VERY FEW PEOPLE IN WESTERN SOCIETY BELIEVE IN ANIMAL RIGHTS
In The USA, Britain and the EU surveys suggest the animal rights philosophy (i.e. no animal use for any reason) is adhered to by less than 3 percent of people. Because of this lack of popular support animal rights corporations can only further their agenda by using their multi-million-dollar war chests to lobby politicians to pass laws denying citizens their right of choice: anti-democratic to say the least. Like autocrats throughout history these wealthy activist corporations don’t trust individual citizens to do “the right thing”.

PROTECTING MORALS?
The World Trade Organisation (WTO) enquiry found that the “EU seal ban” was against its rules, but in the interest of protecting the “morals” of EU citizens the ban would stand: thus buying into the animal rights propaganda that killing seals is somehow immoral. An interesting decision given that many countries within the EU and Britain continue to kill seals legally in the Baltic and North seas. The USA continues to allow harvesting of northern fur seals in the Pribilof Islands, creating an exemption to its own Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), despite the fact that the IUCN lists the species as “vulnerable” and cautions that the Pribilof stock “has experienced a significant, steep decline in recent years.” Yet it bans the importation of Canadian seal products under the same MMPA, despite the fact that the harp seals killed (Nor any of the other seal species killed by Canadians) have never, ever been on any reputable list (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, for example) of endangered or threatened species. Hypocrisy reigns supreme.

SEALING IN CANADA IS RURAL PEOPLE EARNING A LIVING FROM A SUSTAINABLE RESOURCE
Sealing in Canada is about people earning a living. It is about selling the products and using the products for personal needs. Tens of thousands of rural Canadian citizens are directly and indirectly employed in the sealing industry earning a living for their families. Sealing is part of an annual mosaic of income for rural Canadians whose money is derived from a number of individual activities that in total provide a livelihood that enables them to live in their communities. The same thing applies to Canadian farmers, ranchers, trappers, hunters, and so on: the only difference is the species killed. Few rural Canadians have the luxury of a guaranteed annual salary. In fact the same thing applies to rural peoples all over the world.
Animal rights groups keep on about a “buyout” for those in the sealing industry. A one-year buyout? A two-year buyout? Or an annual buyout till all those involved have died? For whom? For sealers, plant workers, truckers, diesel suppliers, insurance agents, garment manufacturers, artists, artisans, grocery suppliers, gun and ammunition stores, vehicle sales people? For all or only some of them? Will they pay the many millions involved? No. These American-headquartered multi-million-dollar corporations want the Canadian tax payer to subsidize their ridiculous views.

BABY SEALS?
The use of the word “baby” is simply an anthropomorphism (the Bambi syndrome) designed to influence and upset urban people who have a total disconnect with the sources of their food, clothing, medicines and other objects of daily use. The seals killed are fully weaned, are independent of their dames, and are on their own to survive or not. This is nature and not the life of Yogi or Pooh bear who live in a fictional fantasyland. It is more akin to killing lambs and calves but quicker and with less emotional trauma and with no landfill pollution issues. Like the lambs and calves the seals are young (but fully independent). Young is an urbanite construct and not reflective of nature. Seals are not helicopter parents. In fact there is only one parent present and after the pup is weaned she takes off looking for a male to continue the cycle.

INSTANT DEATH BY GUNSHOT OR HAKAIPK
About 98% of Canadian seals are killed by a gunshot to the head. It is instantaneous as found by innumerable studies by independent vets from Canada, the USA and the EU. The only negative studies have been bought and paid for by animal rights groups. The reality is that no animal-killing is pretty. It is ugly. But pretty and ugly are not synonyms for right and wrong or good and bad. Sealing is simply an outdoor abattoir without the offal problems of land-based abattoirs: dumping it in landfills. Because what we cannot use we leave on the ice to return to the eco-system as food for birds, marine mammals, fish and crustaceans: ecologically correct and green. We are so green Kermit would blush.

TRAVESTY OF FICTION OVER FACT
The reality of the 50 years of animal rights corporations’ propaganda has been the diminution of the incomes of thousands of Canadian citizens while these American-headquartered groups have collected hundreds of millions of dollars from people who have been mislead into thinking they are supporting animal care and conservation. Malarkey! What this is really all about is money and ego. The almighty dollar and the ego stroke those running the shows get from the media attention. One group alone has assets over $100 million annually.
To paraphrase Winston Churchill: never have so many been so misled by so few for such nefarious reasons. For decades these corporations have said nothing new, yet their comments are deemed “newsworthy”. They and their celebrity friends utter ridiculous comments and no journalists challenge them. It’s a circus, a travesty of fiction over fact, and proof that hypocrisy reigns supreme. It is media manipulation of the highest order. Propaganda is an insidious thing and unless countered by a free press prepared to ask the hard questions it will continue ad infinitum. It is time for individuals, politicians and media to remember the immortal line of Pogo: “We have met the enemy and he is us.”
The anti-sealing story is the second greatest propaganda campaign of the last 85 years. Democracy is about the right of citizens to choose for themselves and not have “owned” politicians steal their democratic rights. History has shown us that when propaganda triumphs, democracy loses. Democracy demands a critical, questioning, sceptical media to succeed but what we get instead, when it comes to sealing, is a media that parrots what is presented and thus becomes little more than the PR arm of the animal rights corporations: both sad and scary.

ANIMAL RIGHTS IS NOT ANIMAL CONSERVATION OR ANIMAL WELFARE
The goal of animal rights corporations like HSUS (Humane Society of the United States and its extension, Humane Society International) and PETA(People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) to name but two is not to end sealing but rather to end man’s use – not just killing, but any use – of all animals for any reason. Read their mission statements. Seals are the tactic not the goal.
Anti-sealing is the epitome of George Orwell’s position in Animal Farm: all animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
The animal rights anti-sealing corporations may have won some battles but not the war. If they win the war you will have to look around to see whom among you will be the next victim. The beef, pork, chicken or lamb producers? The trappers, hunters or fur farmers? The clothes manufacturer, shoemaker, auto manufacturer or furniture manufacturer? Anyone who uses animals for any purpose at all? You?

INDIVIDUAL CITIZENS SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE AND NOT LOSE THEIR DEMOCRATRIC RIGHT TO PROPAGANDA BLINDED POLITICIANS

Nobody in the Canadian sealing industry wants people to buy their products if they do not wish to. Canadian sealers only want all citizens of all countries to have their democratic right to choose for themselves to use or not use seal products.

Related Articles